Claude Fable 5: Anthropic admits “wrong tradeoff” after invisibly throttling rival AI researchers
Researchers published new findings on Claude Fable 5: Anthropic admits “wrong tradeoff” after invisibly throttling rival AI researchers: anthropic reverses course on a policy that would have secretly undermined AI researchers, but another point of contention persists.
After sharp backlash from the research community, the company is now backing down. “We made the wrong tradeoff and we apologize for not getting the balance right,” Anthropic told WIRED. Going forward, any protective measures will be visible to users. Dean Ball, a former White House AI advisor, called the covert approach “shockingly hostile.” Will Brown from open-source startup Prime Intellect put the core criticism bluntly: “It felt like Anthropic was saying to the public, ‘We don’t trust anybody else to do AI research. We are the only ones who have to do AI research.'”Ad That’s not the only controversy around Fable 5, though. Claude Fable 5 requires data retention to run its new safety classifiers—prompts and outputs are stored for up to 30 days, and up to two years if policy violations are flagged. That’s a dealbreaker for some. Microsoft is restricting the model internally because of it, according to The Verge: while all other Claude models run under zero-data-retention rules, Fable 5 doesn’t even show up in the internal model picker for Microsoft’s GitHub Copilot version.AdDEC_D_Incontent-1 TopStories Microsoft researcher builds a working neural network out of goats in Age of Empires II to critique AI science Amazon and five other companies reportedly triggered the government crackdown on Anthropic’s Fable model KPMG fabricated AI case studies in a report designed to sell clients on AI adoption Microsoft’s Copilot Cowork moves to usage-based billing and may tap DeepSeek Zhipu AI’s GLM-5.2 closes in on closed-source leaders in coding marathons Don’t MissWhat Matters Stay in the loop on AI. Clear, useful, no fluff. Follow The Decoder for AI news, background stories and expert analyses.
