Garp Independent AI & technology journalism
Thursday, October 8, 2026 Sign In · Join Subscribe
Latest Crunchbase Data Shows AI’s Most Active Startups Are Becoming Serial Acquirers

AI news, research, models, robotics, chips, startups, and infrastructure coverage.

Updated daily

Home  /  Robotics  /  Can Safeworld convince people that gen AI robots won’t hurt them?

Robotics

Can Safeworld convince people that gen AI robots won’t hurt them?

Can Safeworld convince people that gen AI robots won’t hurt them?

Last day to exhibit your breakthrough to 10,000+ tech leaders at Disrupt is on Oct 2. Book Exhibit Table Now.

Disrupt doors open Oct. 13. Get your pass and bring someone with you at 50% off. REGISTER NOW. The big trend in robots is handing the keys over to a generative AI model, but that brings with it a problem: that architecture isn’t predictable the way traditional algorithms are. How can you be sure your brand new humanoid will be safe? Dr. Ding Zhao, who directs the Safe AI lab at Carnegie Melon University, has been working on this problem for almost his entire career. Now, along with veteran start-up executive Kyle Wong and machine learning engineer Simo Rachidi, he’s founded a company, Safeworld, intended to solve it. “The safety challenge that we’re talking about is a combination of, one, really advanced generative AI probabilistic evals — how do you underwrite the risk of a probabilistic system?” Zhao says. “The second part that’s really hard is the trust part, and you need both to deploy a robot.” Safeworld is emerging from stealth today with a seed round of more than $12 million, led by Shine Capital and a16z Speedrun, with additional investment from Box Group, Carnegie Mellon University Endowment, Innovation Endeavors and SV Angel. “The time to build an industry safety standard is now while robots are being designed and deployed,” a16z Speedrun partner Jonathan Lai told TechCurnch. “By the time you have robots in households colliding with kids and causing safety incidents, that’s way too late.” Safeworld’s speciality is evaluating a robotic control system in simulations that are populated with realistic human models. It’s akin to the challenge faced by companies like Tesla or Wayve, who must ensure that their vehicles respond appropriately to a variety of surprising incidents they may encounter on the road. But that will be more difficult for robots, Zhao argues, because they work in unstructured environments, and because each facility they are in will have different safety standards.